Rus News Journal

the Moscow City Court will consider on December, 27th the complaint of the lawyer of Natalia Popovoj, recognised guilty of swindle at delivery of apartments

the Moscow City Court has appointed to December, 27th consideration of the appeal of the lawyer of the employee of Open Company " Tokada " Natalias Popovoj, recognised guilty of swindle at tenancy of apartments. ABT it " News " on Wednesday lawyer Murad Kahrimanov representing interests of the denounced has informed.

" in the complaint we ask to cancel a sentence of the Tver court of capital and to direct business on new consideration W other structure of court " - Kahrimanov has declared.

on November, 25th the Tver court of capital has sentenced Popovu to 4,5 years of imprisonment. It has been recognised by guilty of the swindle made by the organised group of persons. At removal of the decision the court has considered positive characteristics of the defendant, presence of the juvenile child in this connection has appointed punishment below the lowest limit.

Besides, the court has satisfied the civil suit of victims regarding compensation matelnogo a damage in full. As to moral indemnification the court has obliged Popovu to pay on five thousand roubles to ANY1 victim. popova will serve time in a standard regime penal colony.

in turn victims are dissatisfied with a sentence and intend to appeal against against it in Moscow City Court.

" I would agree with the public prosecutor who asked court to appoint punishment Popovoj in the form of six years of imprisonment " - one of victims Nikolay Sadomov has told.

According to the investigation, Open Company " Tokada " has begun the activity in May, 2003. Under the criminal plan developed by director Baulinoj, workers of firm concluded contracts W clients ABT granting of floor spaces.

they searched for the clients through the advertisements stuck in cars of the underground and on an exit from it. After the conclusion of the contract employees of firm took pledge from 2000 B4 3000 roubles and promised to people to help W rent.

Popova gave out to clients of the receipt 2 prihodno - to cash warrants and RCVed money. In turn employees of firm informed competitors phone number of handed over apartment. When the client called under specified number the woman represented by the mistress of apartment, informed the habitation ADDY.

however subsequently it appeared that to the specified ADDY of houses does not exist, and already nobody responded to calls.