At private security have checked up documentsYesterday seizure of documents in the centre of protection of objects of the supreme bodies of the power of Central administrative board of private security (GUVO) the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation has been spent. In police department on this action do not make comments, but sources connect it with investigation of activity FGUP “ Protection “ which in the stay by the first deputy minister of internal affairs Michael Suhodolsky, recently with scandal ousted supervised the chief sankt - the Petersburg police.
seizure of documents in the centre was spent by employees of Central administrative board of own safety of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and it proceeded some hours. In the ministry have told that dredging has passed easy, and the withdrawn documents concerned various activity of the centre. And in the centre, and in GUVO comments have refused, having referred to operative character of action.
the Center of protection of objects of the supreme bodies of the government is created in February, 1958 as department and after numerous reformirovany enters into Central administrative board of private security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (GUVO). Now in the centre eight departments of police and spetspolk which employees protect buildings of Audit Chamber, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the State Office of Public Prosecutor, the Constitutional, Higher arbitration and Supreme courts, the Ministry of Emergency Measures, of some other ministries and etc. - all more than 500 objects.
sources in the Ministry of Internal Affairs connect yesterday`s seizure of documents with investigation of criminal case concerning management FGUP “ Protection “ which in structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is engaged in commercial activity, protecting apartments, offices, accompanying cargoes and Business etc. has been raised on the facts of abusing by powers and swindle (item 201 and item 159 of the criminal code of Russian Federation). Under the version of the investigation, some directors (while accused of business is not present), getting for needs FGUPa the various equipment and a special equipment at obviously inflated prices, received recoils from businessmen. The preliminary damage estimates a consequence in 140 million rbl. we Will notice that the son of the general Grigory Suhodolsky, on not confirmed while officially given, was the founder of one of the firms, nowadays liquidated which name appears in investigation materials.
by the way, sources “ “ in central office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs do not exclude that business in the relation of heads “ Protection “ there was one of the reasons of removal from a post of the former first deputy minister a general - the colonel of police Michael Suhodolsky who since summer of last year held a post of chief GU the Ministry of Internal Affairs across St.-Petersburg and Leningrad region. The mister Suhodolsky, till 2005 heading GUVO and actually created (he has signed the corresponding order) FGUP “ Protection “ continued to supervise this structure and already being the deputy minister. General director FGUP “ Protection “ Andrey Komissarov is considered in department of the protege of the mister Suhodolsky, and he in 2006 has headed the centre of protection of objects of the supreme bodies of the state power, and then has gone on increase.
however, chief GUVO the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Vadim Savichev has rejected vigorously yesterday communication of seizure of documents with the raised criminal case, having noticed also that personally to it claims from employees GUSB are not present. And lawyer Matvej of Fears representing interests FGUPa has refused comments, having confirmed “ “ that neither accused, nor suspects “ in this insignificant business “ at present is not present.
As to the mister Suhodolsky, it as earlier told “ “ has been ousted the chief Petersburg GU the Ministry of Internal Affairs by the decree of president Dmitry Medvedev after the general in a pointed manner was not on annual board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. It was found out later that in the Petersburg central board the general did not have a relation with subordinates and those even have started to collect signatures under the reference with the request for its resignation.